US War Crimes in Iraq

June 14, 2003

The information and images in this document were taken from the Information Clearinghouse web site – specifically on page www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3450.htm.  The war crimes charges that have been brought against US forces fall into four primary areas – the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas, the destruction of infrastructure vital for public health, protection and organization of looting, and the causing of indiscriminate civilian casualties.  The four main headings below are hyperlinks to documents giving the specific charges in that heading’s area.

1.      The Use of Cluster Bombs in Civilian Areas

a.       The dangers of cluster bombs

(1)   Each cluster bomb is composed of 200 to 700 bomblets.  When each bomblet explodes it fragments into about 300 pieces of jagged steel - sending out virtual blizzards of deadly shrapnel.  People are decapitated, arms, legs, hands, and feet are severed from their bodies – anyone and anything alive in the immediate vicinity is shredded into a bloody mess.

(2)   Cluster bombs cause damage over a very large and imprecise area.  Once released from a U.S. Air Force or Navy jet, cluster bombs fall for a pre-set amount of time or distance before their dispensers open, spreading the bomblets widely so they can effectively slaughter people over a wide area.  The wide dispersal pattern of cluster munitions makes them difficult to target accurately.

(3)   Since 5% to 30% fail to explode at the time set for them, unexploded bombs litter every target area, silent and nondescript.  Until picked up by an unfortunate child or accidentally kicked by a passerby.  In this way they become hidden killers, blending into their surroundings like land mines.  And over time cluster bombs become unstable – they explode more easily.

b.      Cluster bombs and the Geneva conventions

(1)   Although cluster bombs are not explicitly forbidden by the Geneva Law, the rules of war prohibit the use of inherently indiscriminate weapons or weapons that are incapable of being used in a manner that complies with the obligation to distinguish between civilians and combatants.  Those who use them in civilian areas therefore open themselves to charges of war crimes.

c.       Dud rates

(1)   The United States stockpiles over one billion submunitions in weapons currently in service.  Nearly three-quarters of this stockpile of submunitions are contained in MLRS rockets and 155mm artillery projectiles.  Given reported failure rates, a stockpile of that size creates the specter of well over 100 million explosive duds, each posing a danger to civilians similar to antipersonnel landmines.

(2)   The U.S. Department of Defense has acknowledged using nearly 1,500 air-dropped cluster bombs, but has not revealed any information about ground-launched cluster munitions, which may have been much more numerous.  An unnamed U.S. defense official told a reporter for Los Angles Times that the U.S. does not keep track of ground launched cluster munitions.

d.      On-the-Ground Reports

(1)   From The Independent, April 03, 2003:
The scenes at al-Hilla’s hospital on 1 April showed that something terrible had happened.  The bodies of the men, women, and children – both dead and alive – brought to the hospital were punctured with shards of shrapnel from cluster bombs.  Robert Fisk of The Independent wrote: “Terrifying film of women and children later emerged after Reuters and the Associated Press were permitted by the Iraqi authorities to take their cameras into the town.  Their pictures – the first by Western news agencies from the Iraqi side of the battlefront – showed babies cut in half and children with amputation wounds, apparently caused by American shellfire and cluster bombs.  Much of the videotape was too terrible to show on television and the agencies’ Baghdad editors felt able to send only a few minutes of a 21-minute tape that included a father holding out pieces of his baby and screaming, ‘cowards, cowards’ into the camera.  Two (truck)loads of bodies, including women in flowered dresses, could be seen outside the Hilla hospital.”

(2)   From www.arabnews.com:
Six days after the “lliberation” of Najaf, Iraqis of all ages continue to pack the corridors of Saddam Hussein General Hospital.  They are mostly victims of unexploded munitions that are strewn throughout various residential neighborhoods – along streets, in family homes, in school playgrounds, in the fields belonging to farms ....  US forces have been using cluster bombs against Iraqi soldiers.  But the majority of the victims are civilians, mostly children curious about the small shiny objects which are the same size as a child’s hand.  Cluster bombs, as explained by an administrator at the hospital, have been dropped by the hundred.  They are supposed to explode on impact.  However, many do not, and lie on the street exposed to the elements.  A young Iraqi in Najaf told Arab News yesterday: “They are everywhere, and they are going off periodically.  We don't even have to touch them – they just go off by themselves, especially as the temperature rises throughout the day.”  In a residential neighborhood where nine civilians were killed by heavy US shelling last week, a sudden explosion sent this correspondent and civilians running for cover.  Back at Saddam Hussein General Hospital, a seven-year-old boy, the skin burned off his legs, was being turned away by the doctors.  The burns extended from the soles of his feet to midway up his little thighs.  His father, distraught and with a look of desperation on his face, told Arab News as he held his son in his arms: “They say his injuries are minor compared with others here.  They say that they can't waste their medication on him.  They won't even give him painkillers.”    “He was playing at his school when somehow a munition exploded,” the father explained.  “They need to come and clear our schools and homes of these explosives.”  Arab News visited several of the hospital's wards and saw victims of the “liberation” of Najaf.  A six-year-old girl suffering from shrapnel injuries, whose leg was drilled to accommodate a bone brace for her broken thigh, started crying as the doctor explained to the journalists present that her right foot had become gangrenous and so would have to be amputated.  Saddam Hussein General Hospital alone has seen 307 deaths and treated 920 injuries.  Of those, only 20 of the dead and 50 of the injured were soldiers.

e.       Pictures of children who were victims of cluster bombs

(1)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_child1.jpg

(2)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_child2.jpg

(3)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_child3.jpg

(4)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_child4.jpg

2.     Destruction of Infrastructure Vital for Public Health

a.       The Geneva Convention

(1)   The public health consequences of war go far beyond the direct casualties caused by weapons.  Water, for example, is essential to prevent health problems including malnutrition, gastro-intestinal infections, and other communicable diseases.  Without access to safe water sources the civilian population, especially children, are at risk.  Therefore Protocol II of the Geneva Conventions explicitly states: “It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, agricultural areas for the production of foodstuffs, crops, livestock, (or) drinking water installations and supplies.”

b.      Destruction of water and sewer infrastructure

(1)   Basra was the first city that suffered a humanitarian crisis because of the U.S.-British belligerence.  On March 21, air raids destroyed high voltage lines and knocked out Basra's electrical power.  That in turn disabled Basra's water and sanitation systems, including the Wafa’Al Qaed Water Pumping Station, which pumps water from the Shatt al-Arab river to five water treatment plants that supply piped water to over 60 percent of Basra's 1.5 million residents.

(2)   A spokesperson of the World Health Organization warned already on April 6 that Iraq was facing the risk of an outbreak of cholera or other infectious illnesses, as clean drinking water was scarce and hospitals were overwhelmed.  This assessment was echoed by UNICEF on April 21 when they reported a huge increase in child diarrhea cases in Baghdad.  Although water was being supplied to most parts of Baghdad by the end of April, the sanitation situation remained extremely critical and threatened public health.

c.       Destruction of hospitals and ambulances

(1)   Medical infrastructure and personnel enjoys particular protection under the rules of war as laid down in the Geneva Law.  Article 12 of Protocol II states: “Medical units shall be respected and protected at all times and shall not be the object of attack,” while Article 15 adds that “Civilian medical personnel shall be respected and protected.”  Article 21 extends the protection also to medical vehicles, including ambulances.

(2)   Several hospitals sustained severe damage in air raids.  On April 2, for example, U.S. aircraft hit a building opposite the Red Crescent maternity hospital in Baghdad and the blast was so strong that the hospital's roof collapsed.  The maternity hospital is part of a Red Crescent compound that also includes their headquarters and a surgical hospital.  Patients and at least three doctors and nurses working at the hospital were wounded.

(3)   On April 9, (Belgian) doctors Geert Van Moorter and Harrie Dewitte were at the Saddam Center for Plastic Surgery, which was functioning as a frontline hospital for the war-wounded.  They witnessed how one of their ambulances that had left to transport patients to another hospital came back after a couple of minutes, after it had been under fire by U.S. troops.  Two of the patients it transported were dead and the driver and his co-driver had gunshot wounds.  When Dr. Van Moorter went up to a U.S. officer to denounce their attitude, he answered that “the ambulance could contain explosives.”

d.      Pictures of destroyed hospital and mosque

(1)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_hospital.jpg

(2)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_mosque.jpg

e.       Pictures of man in an attacked ambulance

(1)   This man was with his pregnant wife and another pregnant woman in an ambulance going to the hospital.  When they arrived at a checkpoint, American soldiers shot at the ambulance.  The man got out of the vehicle and was wounded in both legs.  At that time, Americans shot until the ambulance caught fire, with the two pregnant women inside.  The man tried to escape, but they continued to shoot at him.  He took a bullet in his hand from that.  Afterwards, two civilians tried to help him, but the Americans shot at them, also.  Two hours later he was rescued by bringing him to the hospital.  When he arrived, it was to late; he had lost his wife, his newborn child, and both his legs.  Here are pictures of the ambulance and the man in the hospital:

(2)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_ambulance.jpg

(3)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_man.jpg

3.      Protection and Organization of Looting

a.       The Geneva Conventions

(1)   More damaging than the direct impact of the fighting was the looting and arson that erupted as soon as the U.S. and British troops had gained control over the cities.  This is particularly alarming as the occupying powers have the responsibility to ensure public order and safety.  Moreover, the Fourth Geneva Convention states that an occupying power has the duty "of ensuring and maintaining, with the cooperation of national and local authorities, the medical and hospital establishments and services, public health and hygiene in the occupied territories."  US and UK authorities were repeatedly warned before the conflict by Amnesty International and others that there was a grave risk of widespread disorder, humanitarian crisis and human rights abuses, including revenge attacks, once the Iraqi government's authority was removed.  Now that US/UK forces are occupying substantial parts of Iraq, they must live up to their specific responsibilities under international human rights and humanitarian law to protect the rights of Iraqi people.

b.      Inaction by US forces concerning looting

(1)   As US and UK tanks swept into the centre of major Iraqi cities in recent days, numerous observers on the ground reported on the chaos and lawlessness that filled the political vacuum created.  Beginning in Basra on 7 April, followed by Baghdad on 9 April and Kirkuk the following day, crowds of desperate people have taken to the streets, looting, burning, and destroying government offices and, more ominously, institutions vital to their future, including schools, universities, and hospitals.  In most cases, the occupying forces have stood by, apparently unwilling to take on policing functions.

(2)   The occupying forces are also obliged to ensure the supply of food and medical supplies.  Therefore the protection and rehabilitation of the medical infrastructure should be one of their priorities.  On April 11 Islam Online reported that the Al-Kindi hospital in Baghdad had been looted the day before.  Medicines and two ambulances were stolen, and all staff had fled except for two doctors.  U.S. troops called to assist replied that they had no orders to intervene.

(3)   The National Museum of Iraq recorded a history of civilizations that began to flourish in the fertile plains of Mesopotamia more than 7,000 years ago.  But once American troops entered Baghdad in sufficient force to topple Saddam Hussein's government this week, it took only 48 hours for the museum to be destroyed, with at least 50,000 artifacts carried away by looters.  Officials with crumpled spirits fought back tears and anger at American troops, as they ran down an inventory of the most storied items that they said had been carried away by the thousands of looters who poured into the museum after daybreak on Thursday and remained until dusk on Friday, with only one intervention by American troops, lasting about half an hour, at lunchtime on Thursday.  Nothing remained, museum officials said, at least nothing of real value, from a museum that had been regarded by archaeologists and other specialists as perhaps the richest of all such institutions in the Middle East.

(4)   Khaled Bayomi is PhD student in  Sweden.  He went to Baghdad as a human shield, and arrived on the same day the fighting began.  Here is his eyewitness account, edited for length and clarity, of an incident of looting he witnessed:

“On the afternoon of April 8, the fighting was so heavy I couldn't make it over to the other side of the river.  On the afternoon it became perfectly quiet, and four American tanks pulled up in position on the outskirts of the slum area.  From these tanks we heard calls in Arabic, which told the population to come closer.

“During the morning everybody that tried to cross the streets had been fired upon.  But during this strange silence, people eventually became curious.  After three-quarters of an hour the first Baghdad citizens dared to come forward.  At that moment the US solders shot two Sudanese guards, who were posted in front of a local administrative building, on the other side of Haifa Avenue.

“I was just 300 meters away when the guards where murdered.  Then they shot the building entrance to pieces, and their Arabic translators in the tanks told people to run and grab things inside the building.  Rumors spread rapidly, and the house was cleaned out.  Moments later tanks broke down the doors to the Justice Department, in a neighboring building, and it was also looted.

“I was standing in a big crowd of civilians that saw all this together with me.  They did not take part in the looting, but were to afraid to take any action against it.  Many of them had tears of shame in their eyes.  The next morning looting spread to the Museum of Modern Art, another 500 meters to the north.

c.       Pictures of looting and US inaction

(1)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_looted_hospital.jpg

(2)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_looted_office.jpg

(3)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_looted_furniture.jpg

(4)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_soldier1.jpg

(5)   www.tom-davis.org/live-and-let-live/2003_06_soldier2.jpg

4.      Indiscriminate Civilian Casualties

a.       International humanitarian law

(1)   International Humanitarian Law, particularly the Law of Geneva consisting of the four 1949 Geneva Conventions and the two 1977 Additional Protocols, obliges the belligerents to make a distinction between persons taking part in the hostilities and the civilian population.  The latter should be spared as much as possible.  Therefore, indiscriminate attacks and use of indiscriminate weapons are prohibited.  International humanitarian law is a body of rules and principles that seek to mitigate the effects of war.  It prohibits attacks which do not attempt to distinguish between military targets and civilians or civilian objects (indiscriminate attacks).  It also prohibits attacks which, although aimed at a legitimate military target, have a disproportionate impact on civilians or civilian objects.

(2)   According to the Statute of the International Criminal Court, "war crimes" include:

(a)   Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against
individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities; and

(b)   Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated.

b.      Civilian casualties

(1)   Many civilian injuries and deaths are reported in the sections above, so we won’t report details here – just point you to several resources to find more information.

(2)   Last Wednesday the American-Statesman printed a report from the Associated Press, that 3,420 civilian war deaths have been discovered so far.  The article is at
www.statesman.com/asection/content/auto/epaper/editions/today/news_e36e5de0c3bf80e900e8.html,.

(3)   The web site www.iraqbodycount.org reports that between 5,530 and 7,200 civilian deaths have been reported.  That web site says, “Casualty figures are derived solely from a comprehensive survey of online media reports.”

(4)   An article on the web site of the British newspaper The Herald reports that the civilian death count could go as high as 10,000; the article is at
www.theherald.co.uk/news/archive/23-5-19103-23-48-54.html.